FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Why Free Texts Don't Flatten Political Voice: Uganda Study Reveals Price Paradox

Interest ArticulationICT AccessUganda Village CommunicationSubsidized Messaging CostsAfrican Politics@APSR2 datasetsDataverse
African Politics subfield banner

Access to ICT changes political communication dynamics by lowering barriers for the poor, yet risks favoring connected citizens. A novel approach in Uganda tested this tension using randomized text message price experiments on 1600 residents.

Using bold labels and emojis:

• Existing Channels: Traditional methods often excluded marginalized groups due to cost barriers

• Our Innovation: Randomized pricing allowed direct comparison of different access models (existing rates, full cost subsidy)

• Key Insight: Subsidizing message costs increased overall uptake by over 40%, but free messaging didn't lead to further flattening

• Marginalized Advantage: Despite subsidies boosting use across the board, marginalized groups still showed lower educational attainment and higher status indicators than expected

Article card for article: "I Wld Like U WMP to Extend Electricity 2 Our Village:" on Information Technology and Interest Articulation
"I Wld Like U WMP to Extend Electricity 2 Our Village:" on Information Technology and Interest Articulation was authored by Guy Grossman, Macartan Humphreys and Gabriella Sacramone-Lutz. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2014.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
American Political Science Review
Edit article record marker