FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Human Rights Not Stagnant? How Monitoring Standards Shift Interpretations
Insights from the Field
repression measurement
accountability standards
UN convention against torture
norm monitoring
Comparative Politics
APSR
1 archives
Dataverse
Respect for Human Rights Has Improved over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability was authored by Christopher Fariss. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2014.

New data shows human rights respect improving over time, contrary to indicators of political repression.

This study argues the apparent stagnation in human rights practices masks a crucial change: monitoring standards evolve, making accountability assessments more stringent. As organizations like Amnesty International and U.S. State Department scrutinize more places and classify additional acts as abuses, their benchmarks for state behavior tighten considerably.

New Measurement Approach: The author introduces an unbiased model using existing data sources to gauge repression accurately.

Key Findings:

  • Human rights respect has increased over the last three decades despite norm proliferation and enhanced monitoring.
  • A positive correlation exists between human rights improvement and ratification of the UN Convention Against Torture, differing from prior research.

This work challenges conventional interpretations of repression data by accounting for how measurement criteria themselves have become more demanding.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
American Political Science Review
Podcast host Ryan