Contrasting views persist in political science regarding elected officials' decision-making. Some assume politicians act more strategically than citizens; others suggest their traits amplify choice biases.

Researchers addressed this gap by conducting experiments with Belgian, Canadian, and Israeli incumbents.

The findings reveal politicians are equally or more susceptible to several key anomalies:

• Escalation bias: Politicians showed stronger commitment continuation when faced with sunk costs compared to nonpolicians

• Status-quo preference: They favored established policies presented as defaults over alternatives

• Framing effects: Risk assessments varied significantly based on question phrasing, demonstrating strong susceptibility to cognitive framing

• Time discounting: Their preferences for immediate rewards differed substantially from citizens' patterns

These results challenge conventional assumptions about political rationality and suggest fundamental similarities in decision-making processes across populations.

Keywords: Experimental Study, Belgium, Canada, Israel, Choice Anomalies