FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Human Rights Scores Depend on Model Assumptions, Not Reality
Insights from the Field
latent variable scoring
statistical modeling assumptions
regression analysis
human rights violations
Comparative Politics
APSR
30 R files
3 other files
16 datasets
3 text files
Dataverse
Are Human Rights Practices Improving? was authored by David Cingranelli and Mikhail Filippov. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2018.

Does government protection of human rights improve? The answer depends crucially on how we model it. Fariss (2014) proposed a statistical approach that produced latent scores suggesting an overall improving trend.

Method: We replicated his analysis but replaced actual data with randomly generated indicators for common violations like torture and political imprisonment, mimicking the effect of his specific weighting strategy.

We found identical improving trends using this fake-data replication. However, when we relaxed Fariss' assumptions to allow all human rights violation types equal influence on the latent scores, that positive trend vanished entirely.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
American Political Science Review
Podcast host Ryan