NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Polarization's Double-Edged Sword: Unequal Trust in Opposing Presidents Found

Does shared ideology mean more trust in a president? This analysis reveals an asymmetry: U.S. conservatives show greater trust and legitimacy for presidents from the opposing party compared to liberals, challenging conventional polarization assumptions.

Research Methods: Using extensive survey data (ANES, GSS) from five decades, researchers identify this partisan disparity.

Key Findings: Liberals are significantly more likely than conservatives to distrust a Republican president. Conversely, they grant legitimacy to conservative-led governments more readily than vice versa.

Why It Matters: This asymmetrical 'president-in-power' effect underscores the fragility of democratic norms and highlights how differing perceptions among political factions can impact governmental stability.

American Political Science Review
An Asymmetrical 'President-In-Power' Effect was authored by Davide Morisi, John T. Jost and Vishal Singh. It was published in APSR in 2019. Find on Google Scholar10.1017/S0003055418000850
Political Behavior subfield banner