FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Powersharing in Post-Conflict Democracies: Inclusive vs Constraining Effects

Comparative Politics subfield banner

New research examines political powersharing institutions (ethnic quotas, federalism, independent judiciaries) and their effects on democratic survival from 1975 to 2015 using a global dataset. 📊

Key findings reveal sharp distinctions across types of powersharing:

* Ethnic Quotas & Federalism: Inclusive policies help minority interests but can undermine democracy if introduced post-conflict; dispersive systems like federalism tend to destabilize post-conflict democracies.

* Independent Judiciaries & Constitutional Protections: Constraining institutions, safeguarding leader accountability and rights regardless of context, consistently improve democratic survival. 🏛️⚖️

This means that institution-builders should strategically implement constraining powersharing mechanisms for lasting democratic stability rather than focusing solely on inclusive approaches. 💡

Article card for article: Safeguarding Democracy: Powersharing and Democratic Survival
Safeguarding Democracy: Powersharing and Democratic Survival was authored by Michael K. Miller, Benjamin Graham and Kaare Strom. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2017.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
American Political Science Review