FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Partisan Media Can Reduce Political Polarization: A New Experimental Approach Reveals Surprising Effects
Insights from the Field
partisan media
attitude polarization
experimental design
pica design
Political Behavior
APSR
7 R files
1 text files
5 datasets
Dataverse
Persuading the Enemy: Estimating the Persuasive Effects of Partisan Media With the Preference-Incorporating Choice and Assignment Design was authored by Justin de Benedictis Kessner, Matthew A. Baum, Adam J. Berinsky and Teppei Yamamoto. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2019.

While partisan media are often seen as reinforcing political divides, this study explores their potential to also reduce polarization between different ideological groups. We introduce the Preference-Incorporating Choice and Assignment (PICA) design, combining free choice with forced exposure in an innovative experimental approach.

Our research goes beyond previous studies by accounting for discrepancies between stated media preferences and actual viewing choices, a common source of bias that we address explicitly.

Key Findings:

We find partisan media can polarize its regular audience and*

* Inadvertently polarize those who would otherwise not consume it.

Crucially, ideologically opposing partisan media were found to reduce* existing polarization between consumers.

Why It Matters:

The findings offer a nuanced understanding of partisan media effects—capable of both deepening divides and potentially bridging them—and highlight the complex relationship between media consumption choices and political attitudes.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
American Political Science Review
Podcast host Ryan