FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Conditional Acceptance of Vote Buying by Clients? NGOs vs Politicians

Vote BuyingClient AttributesExperimental ApproachLatin AmericaLatin American PoliticsAJPS1 Stata file1 datasetDataverse
Latin American Politics subfield banner

Vote buying is widely denounced as corrupting democratic politics.

Hypothesis

The study argues that public attitudes toward vote buying depend on specific factors.

  • Client socioeconomic status
  • Potential client's political leanings

Methodology

Survey experiments conducted across Latin American countries.

  • Presented hypothetical vote buying scenarios to respondents
  • Varying the characteristics of both the buyer and seller

Key Findings

Evaluations of vote buying are highly conditional on specific factors.

  • Socioeconomic status significantly impacts acceptance levels
  • Political predispositions moderate disapproval reactions
  • People often weigh concrete benefits against abstract democratic costs

Implications

This nuanced understanding challenges simplistic views of vote buying.

  • Normative assessments depend on contextual factors rather than being universally repudiated
  • Economic realities may shape public acceptance in ways not anticipated by anti-corruption campaigns

Article card for article: The Conditionality of Vote Buying Norms: Experimental Evidence from Latin America
The Conditionality of Vote Buying Norms: Experimental Evidence from Latin America was authored by Ezequiel Gonzalez Ocantos, Chad Kiewiet de Jonge and David W. Nickerson. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2014.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science
Edit article record marker