FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Name Recognition Still Matters for Lesser-Known Candidates

Incumbency Advantagename recognitionelectoral viabilitylaboratory experimentsVoting and Elections@AJPSDataverse
Voting and Elections subfield banner

Elections often feature unknown candidates, raising questions about how recognition affects support.

Does knowing a candidate's name breed contempt or indifference? Or does it foster affection?

The authors conducted three laboratory experiments to definitively show that name recognition influences voter preferences. Crucially, this effect stems from voters' inferences about viability rather than familiarity or charisma.

However, the study also demonstrates that other cues can override this—incumbency significantly diminishes the impact of being recognized.

To test robustness in a real-world setting, they designed a field experiment involving yard signs and county elections. The findings suggest name recognition remains influential even when candidates are less prominent.

Article card for article: Name Recognition and Candidate Support
Name Recognition and Candidate Support was authored by Cindy D. Kam and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2013.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science