FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
High Knowledge, Low Trust: Why Conservatives and Liberals Differ on Conspiracies
Insights from the Field
conspiracies
political knowledge
trust
motivated reasoning
Political Behavior
AJPS
2 Stata files
2 PDF files
2 datasets
1 text files
Dataverse
Conspiracy Endorsement As Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust was authored by Joanne Miller, Kyle Saunders and Christina Farhart. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2016.

Conspiracy beliefs shape political discourse, yet their individual-level drivers remain unclear. This study examines conspiratorial predispositions through a motivational lens, arguing that belief serves psychological needs alongside ideological ones.

Drawing from existing literature, we identify two key moderating factors: high political knowledge and low trust levels. These traits combine to increase susceptibility among politically knowledgeable citizens lacking institutional confidence.

Specifically, we find:

  • Highly knowledgeable individuals are most prone to conspiratorial thinking when distrusting institutions
  • Political ideology shapes these vulnerabilities differently across the partisan divide
  • Conservative and liberal pathways toward conspiracy endorsement diverge significantly

Our analysis of survey data reveals nuanced differences in how partisans respond politically when they distrust government explanations.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science
Podcast host Ryan