Ethnic Geography & Officer Placement
This study examines how Kenyan autocrats strategically assigned officers during multi-party elections. The research shows a distinct pattern where presidents placed coethnic officers in swing areas while keeping opposition's coethnic officers away.
Data Analysis
Using an unprecedented data set of 8,000 local security appointments from Kenya's 1990s period,
- researchers identified officer assignments based on ethnicity and area importance for the election
- analysis revealed systematic placement patterns across different regions
Key Findings
The findings demonstrate a significant principal-agent problem:
- Autocrats strategically deployed loyal officers to key electoral districts.
- This ethnic matching strategy helps secure votes in competitive areas while avoiding potential opposition leverage.
Significance for Democratization Theory
This research reveals how state institutions from Kenya's previous authoritarian era persistently influence democratic processes despite official multi-party reforms. The strategic use of coethnic appointments demonstrates a mechanism by which autocratic legacies can undermine electoral fairness and full democratization.
