FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Response Rates Miss the Mark: German Study Reveals Bureaucratic Discrimination

Conjoint ExperimentsBureaucratic DiscriminationResponse QualityEthnic MinoritiesEuropean Politics@AJPS11 R file1 Stata file2 datasetsDataverse
European Politics subfield banner

Previous experiments on ethnic minority discrimination measured only response rates to fictional requests. However, this approach misses a key distinction.

Researchers conducted a conjoint experiment across all German welfare offices by randomly varying five applicant traits and designing realistic scenarios. They analyzed not just who responded but the quality of that interaction.

Key findings:

  • Response rates were statistically identical regardless of ethnicity.
  • Non-Germans consistently received significantly lower quality responses.
  • This discrimination potentially discourages applications for crucial benefits.
  • It appears more severe in locally-run offices than nationally-affiliated ones.

This nuanced understanding demonstrates that simplistic measures like response rates alone cannot capture the full extent of bureaucratic inequality.

Article card for article: Multiple Dimensions of Bureaucratic Discrimination: Evidence from German Welfare Offices
Multiple Dimensions of Bureaucratic Discrimination: Evidence from German Welfare Offices was authored by Anselm Rink and Johannes Hemker. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2017.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science