FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Campaigns' Gut Feelings Beat Ambivalence in Shaping Voter Attitude and Boosting Turnout

gut feelingambivalence moderationattitude formation experimentsANES datasetPolitical Behavior@AJPS4 Stata files3 datasetsDataverse
Political Behavior subfield banner

Political science has long debated whether campaigns win by appealing to voters' emotions ('hearts') or their minds ('heads'). This article bridges this gap, demonstrating through original experiments and analyses of ANES data (1980–2004) that a positive gut feeling toward candidates moderates the negative impact of ambivalence on attitude formation. 🔍 The effect is strongest among lower-income voters, where turnout is typically lowest. 💡 By focusing on emotional connection with these crucial demographics, campaigns can overcome cognitive conflict and increase participation—a finding particularly relevant for those seeking to boost voter engagement in vulnerable populations.

Article card for article: Of Two Minds, But One Heart: A Good "Gut" Feeling Moderates the Effect of Ambivalence on Attitude Formation and Turnout
Of Two Minds, But One Heart: A Good "Gut" Feeling Moderates the Effect of Ambivalence on Attitude Formation and Turnout was authored by Eric Groenendyk. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science