FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Beyond Echo Chambers: Political Talk Driven by Social Ties Not Similarity

Political Behavior subfield banner

Does political discussion in democracy stem from deliberate choices or random encounters? This paper compares two models. One suggests people seek out knowledgeable and politically similar discussants (purposive model). The other proposes politics is often a side effect of social interactions unrelated to ideology (incidental model). Using unique whole-network panel data across multiple sites, we find incidental connections dominate over expected purposive ones.

Article card for article: The Incidental Pundit: Who Talks Politics with Whom, and Why?
The Incidental Pundit: Who Talks Politics with Whom, and Why? was authored by William Minozzi, Hyunjin Song, David M.J. Lazer, Michael A. Neblo and Katherine Ognyanova. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2020.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science