FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Online Tally Shifts: How Dominant Candidates Gain Perceived Competence During Political Conflict
Insights from the Field
online tally
context-dependent retrieval
conflict contexts
candidate dominance
Political Behavior
AJPS
2 Stata files
12 PDF files
1 text files
2 datasets
Dataverse
Online Tallies and the Context of Politics: How Online Tallies Make Dominant Candidates Appear Competent in Contexts of Conflict was authored by Lasse Laustsen and Michael Bang Petersen. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2020.

Online tallies—impressions of candidate dominance—are stored durably in citizens' long-term memory. These tallies are context-sensitive, retrieved differently depending on whether the political environment is conflict-ridden or not.

🔍 Data & Methods: Population-based panel surveys with embedded experiments

🧠 Key Findings:

  • Citizens store extremely durable online impressions of candidate dominance
  • In conflict contexts, negative evaluations quickly shift to positive associations with dominance

⚖️ Context Matters: The existence of context-sensitive online tallies can favor dominant candidates even if they are unappealing or disagree on policy issues. This suggests that online impressions interact dynamically with political environments.

💡 Why It Matters: Revisits the original notion of online tallies in voting behavior while revealing a previously unknown dimension—candidate dominance appears to enhance perceived competence during periods of conflict.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science
Podcast host Ryan