FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Political Knowledge Shapes Belief Networks: A Look at Density, Central Preferences Over Time

Political Behavior subfield banner

This article examines how political knowledge influences belief network dynamics over time.

New Findings: Using network analysis, the authors reveal several previously overlooked patterns. First, they find that among politically knowledgeable individuals versus those with less knowledge,

* Belief Network Density increases significantly and asymmetrically over time.

* Symbolic preferences remain consistently central in belief networks regardless of survey timing or population group.

Second, regarding centrality changes:

* Among knowledgeable populations, symbolic beliefs become more central faster than policy beliefs do.

* Policy beliefs themselves show increased centrality over time among the politically knowledgeable.

Crucially, Limitations: The authors identify a disconnect: while belief networks are often described using vernacular of individual-level 'conversion' theories (like Converse's), their findings suggest this mismatch limits our understanding. They argue that network analysis reveals population-based patterns inconsistent with traditional conversion frameworks.

Article card for article: Change We Can Believe In: Structural and Content Dynamics Within Belief Networks
Change We Can Believe In: Structural and Content Dynamics Within Belief Networks was authored by Nicholas T. Davis and Nic Fishman. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2022.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science