FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Power Sharing's Democratic Link Is Surprisingly Weak: New Dataset Reveals Commonality in Post-Conflict States

Power SharingInclusive InstitutionsPost Conflict StatesElectoral DemocracyComparative PoliticsBJPS4 datasetsDataverse
Comparative Politics subfield banner

New global dataset analyzes political power sharing, 1975–2010. It disaggregates arrangements into three dimensions: inclusive access; policy autonomy granting (dispersive); and authority constraints.

Contrary to existing literature associating power sharing with democracy and conflict resolution, this study finds:

* Inclusive institutions are widespread in post-conflict states but least tied to electoral democracy;

* Constraining institutions, while rare even in post-conflict contexts, show a strong correlation with democratic systems.

These findings challenge previous assumptions about power sharing's relationship with democracy.

Article card for article: Inclusion, Dispersion, and Constraint: Powersharing in the World's States, 1975-2010
Inclusion, Dispersion, and Constraint: Powersharing in the World's States, 1975-2010 was authored by Kaare W. Strom, Scott Gates, Benjamin A.T. Graham and Havard Strand. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2017.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
Edit article record marker