FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Insights from the Field

Campaigns' Overconfidence Outweighs Fear in Election Predictions


Campaign perception
Incumbency advantage
Optimism bias
2012 election
Voting and Elections
BJPS
1 Stata files
1 text files
3 datasets
Dataverse
Campaign Perceptions of Electoral Closeness: Uncertainty, Fear, and Over-Confidence was authored by Ryan Enos and Eitan D. Hersh. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2017.

This study surveyed staffers from nearly 200 campaigns during the 2012 U.S. elections, asking about expected vote margins.

Campaign Survey Design

The research partnered with state Democratic parties and directly assessed campaign personnel's perceptions.

Key Staff Perceptions

Survey respondents consistently showed more optimism than fear when evaluating their chances:

• Campaign staff across races expressed confidence in victory rather than anxiety about loss

• Optimism was particularly pronounced among campaigns representing incumbents or higher offices

Election Psychology Implications

The findings suggest political operatives tend toward unrealistically favorable assessments.

This widespread overconfidence may limit the effectiveness of relying on electoral competition alone as a mechanism for democratic accountability.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
Podcast host Ryan