FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

How Voters Use Categories, Not Continua: The Center's Role in Shaping Political Preferences

Spatial VotingCategorization theoryIdeological centerIn-group biasPolitical Theory@BJPS14 Stata files1 datasetDataverse
Political Theory subfield banner

This article introduces a categorization theory of spatial voting.

Voter Categorization Theory

Our theory suggests voters perceive political stances through coarse classifications defined by the ideological center.

Behavioral Findings

* Voter behavior significantly diverges from standard utility maximization models along ideological continua.

* Voters exhibit preference discontinuities, favoring parties on their side more than traditional spatial models predict.

Mechanism and Implications

This challenges the existing focus on proximity rules alone. Our analysis shows these rules primarily help distinguish parties within the same side of the center. Importantly, voter party evaluations contain a nontrivial identity component that generates in-group biases not accounted for by standard spatial models.

Article card for article: A Categorization Theory of Spatial Voting: How the Center Divides the Political Space
A Categorization Theory of Spatial Voting: How the Center Divides the Political Space was authored by Jørgen Bølstad and Elias Dinas. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2017.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
British Journal of Political Science