NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Voters Reward Spending Growth And Fiscal Health In Gubernatorial Elections

Economic voting dynamics in gubernatorial elections are often assumed to focus solely on spending, but this study reveals a more nuanced voter behavior.

Examining State Fiscal Conditions (1982–2013)

  • Analyzed gubernatorial election outcomes across multiple states during 41 years.
  • Investigated the relationship between voters and state fiscal health indicators.

Key Findings:

  • Voters positively respond to both overall fiscal health AND spending growth, rewarding incumbent parties for these economic factors.
  • Contrary to previous research suggesting voter punishment of higher spending, this study finds that voters reward BOTH fiscal responsibility AND increased public investment in gubernatorial elections.

Policy Implications & Research Context:

  • Enhanced accountability exists under unified government or when governors possess stronger budget powers.
  • This nuanced understanding moves beyond simplistic models linking election outcomes solely to spending decisions.
State Politics & Policy Quarterly
Fiscal Accountability in Gubernatorial Elections was authored by Jeff Cummins and Thomas T. Holyoke. It was published in SPPQ in 2018. Find on Google Scholar10.1177/1532440018792260
Voting and Elections subfield banner