FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Fiscal Flexibility Enables States to Protect Physical Integrity Rights

RepressionFiscal FlexibilitySovereign CreditPhysical Integrity RightsComparative Politics@BJPS2 Stata filesDataverse
Comparative Politics subfield banner

This study explores how fiscal flexibility via sovereign credit markets affects a state's ability to protect citizens' physical integrity.

Sovereign Credit & Fiscal Space: Favorable borrowing conditions create resources that allow leaders to meet demands without widespread repression or avoid unintended abuses of power by security forces.

* Resource Availability: States with easier access to international finance can fund alternative policy solutions.

* Institutional Control: Such states are less likely to experience 'agency loss' where officials misuse government revenues.

Physical Integrity Rights & Conflict Mitigation:

* Policy Response Diversification: Creditworthy governments have more tools than repression when addressing dissent.

* Resilience During Crises: Favorable credit terms buffer against revenue shocks, preventing a decline in respect for physical integrity rights even during violent protests or political crises.

Implications & Conclusion:

This research demonstrates that sovereign borrowing conditions are not merely financial matters but have profound implications for governance and citizens' protection. Access to international capital strengthens the state's capacity to govern without resorting to widespread human rights abuses.

Article card for article: The Physical Consequences of Fiscal Flexibility: Sovereign Credit and Physical Integrity Rights
The Physical Consequences of Fiscal Flexibility: Sovereign Credit and Physical Integrity Rights was authored by Matthew DiGiuseppe and K. Chad Clay. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2017.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
British Journal of Political Science