FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

How Autocracies Control Who Leaves: Migration Policy and Geopolitical Stability

emigration policydemocratic diffusiongeopolitical stabilityMigration Citizenship@BJPS2 Stata files2 datasetsDataverse
Migration Citizenship subfield banner

This article examines how autocrats strategically balance motives in shaping emigration policies.

Data & Methods: Using 50 years of bilateral migration data, the study analyzes expected emigration flows by calculating their level and destinations based on exogenous geographic and socioeconomic factors.

Key Findings:

  • Autocrats restrict emigration when citizens disproportionately move to democracies 🏛️
  • These restrictions protect against democratic diffusion risks 🔐
  • Conversely, higher economic migration predicts autocratic survival 💼
  • The findings suggest that migration policies serve as a tool for regime maintenance and stability management 📊

Why It Matters: This research reveals the complex relationship between emigration freedom, geopolitical strategy, and political system durability. It demonstrates how authoritarian regimes strategically manage population flows to consolidate power while mitigating democratic diffusion risks.

Article card for article: Restraining the Huddled Masses: Migration Policy and Autocratic Survival
Restraining the Huddled Masses: Migration Policy and Autocratic Survival was authored by Michael K. Miller and Margaret E. Peters. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2020.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
British Journal of Political Science