FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Text Matching Offers New Solutions for Addressing Confounding Observational Gaps
Insights from the Field
Observational Studies
Text Confounders
Matching Methods
Causal Inference
Methodology
AJPS
14 R files
6 text files
19 PDF files
1 archives
3 datasets
9 other files
Dataverse
Adjusting for Confounding with Text Matching was authored by Margaret E. Roberts, Brandon M. Stewart and Richard A. Nielsen. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2020.

New research introduces a solution to tackle confounding in observational studies, particularly when dealing with high-dimensional text data. Instead of relying on traditional matching methods that fall short, the approach focuses on estimating low-dimensional summaries from text and using them via matching to adjust for bias.

The proposed method—topical inverse regression matching—allows analysts to condition both on topical content within confounding documents and treatment probabilities embedded in those texts.

This technique was tested with two revealing applications. First, it examined how perceptions of author gender affect citation counts in international relations literature by analyzing document language patterns.

Second, the approach demonstrated its ability to capture nuanced effects related to censorship on Chinese social media users through careful text analysis.

Core Contribution:

  • A novel matching strategy that works specifically with text confounders
  • 🔍 Balances the need for summary statistics while preserving topical information from large text datasets
  • 📊 Enables researchers to properly condition on both document topics and treatment probabilities simultaneously

Key Implications:

  • This method significantly improves causal inference in social sciences where textual confounders are common.
  • Paves the way for more precise observational studies across political contexts including media analysis and representation dynamics.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science
Podcast host Ryan