FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Drawing Stripes: How Random Selection Shapes MP Motivations

New ZealandMembers BillsPrivate Members BillsRandom SelectionComparative PoliticsPSR&M4 Stata files5 datasetsDataverse
Subfield banner image

New Zealand MPs introduce members' bills despite low approval chances, strategically linking electoral connections with signaling competence to co-partisans.

🔹 Random Private Member's Bills: Drawing lots determines which MPs propose legislation—a method previously underutilized in political studies.

📊 Survey Findings: Voters approve more of electorally vulnerable MPs whose randomly selected bills align with their interests or party loyalty.

🗳️ Incentive Analysis: Both parties and constituents reward legislative effort, creating a powerful motivation for vulnerable MPs to introduce such bills.

🔍 MP Behavior: This electoral connection serves as an unexpected pathway for MPs lacking government agenda control to signal competence despite limited influence.

Article Card
Luck of the Draw? Members' Bills & the Electoral Connection was authored by Indridi Indridason and Brian Williams. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2018.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Science Research & Methods
Edit article record marker