
Why This Question Matters
Political agenda-setting is central to how issues gain public salience and move onto institutional decision agendas. Daniel Sandvej Eriksen challenges a common, but under-theorized, assumption: that political parties do more than respond to events—they can proactively initiate and elevate issues. Clarifying how parties exercise this agency matters for understanding media dynamics, parliamentary debate, and party strategy.
The Issue Initiation Model
Eriksen develops the Issue Initiation Model to theorize two linked party strategies: initiation (introducing or foregrounding an issue) and elevation (raising its prominence so other actors pay attention). The model identifies the mechanisms through which parties can deliberately create momentum for topics—from coordinated messaging to timed escalations that aim to attract media and parliamentary attention.
Data and Empirical Approach
The model is tested using a large digital-trace dataset spanning 2015–2022 in two democracies: the United Kingdom and Denmark. The empirical materials include:
Analysis links party communications to downstream patterns in media coverage and parliamentary activity to detect evidence of initiation and elevation across contexts.
Key Findings
Implications for Agenda-Setting Research
This study brings party agency to the foreground of agenda-setting scholarship and supplies a tested conceptual and empirical toolkit for studying how political actors create issue momentum. The Issue Initiation Model and the accompanying digital-trace evidence invite researchers and practitioners to treat parties as active drivers—rather than passive responders—of public and institutional attention.

| Initiate and Elevate! How Political Parties Can Set an Agenda was authored by Daniel Sandvej Eriksen. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2026. |