FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Why Gender Quotas Left Men in Charge of Tunisian Mayors

African Politics subfield banner

🔎 The Central Puzzle:

Tunisia’s 2018 municipal elections adopted strict gender quotas that produced near-parity between male and female elected councilors. Yet fewer than 20% of mayors—who are chosen from among elected list-heads—were women. This research investigates why quotas raised descriptive representation on councils but failed to convert into council leadership.

🧭 How the evidence was gathered:

  • Analysis of official election results from the 2018 municipal contests
  • An original survey of candidates who ran in those elections
  • In-depth interviews with party actors and candidates

🔍 What parties did:

  • Parties systematically placed female-headed lists in their weakest electoral districts, increasing the number of women elected as councilors but lowering the odds those women would be list-heads eligible for mayoral selection.
  • This placement strategy disadvantaged female candidates during the mayor-selection process because mayors are drawn from elected list-heads.
  • Interview and survey evidence indicate these placement choices were motivated by a desire to avoid 'displacing' men who occupy established political networks and clientelist positions.

💡 Key findings:

  • Strict list quotas produced near-parity among elected councilors in 2018.
  • Despite near-parity on councils, women comprised under 20% of mayors because parties concentrated female list-heads where electoral returns or internal promotion chances were weakest.
  • Party elites used quota compliance to expand descriptive representation without disrupting existing male-dominated leadership structures.

⚖️ Why it matters:

These results show that quota laws alone do not guarantee leadership parity. Party-level strategies—particularly candidate placement and protection of established male networks—can blunt the effect of even strict quotas. The findings highlight the need to consider internal party incentives and mayor-selection rules when designing reforms aimed at improving substantive gender representation.

Article card for article: What Men Want: Parties' Strategic Engagement with Gender Quotas
What Men Want: Parties' Strategic Engagement with Gender Quotas was authored by Alexandra Blackman, Aytug Sasmaz and Julia Clark. It was published by Sage in CPS in 2024.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Sage Journals
Comparative Political Studies
Edit article record marker