
What the Paper Asks
Shane Singh investigates whether the act of holding elections — not just the experience of winning or losing — raises citizens’ satisfaction with democracy. He proposes that elections provide distinct psychosocial, representational, and economic benefits that can increase democratic satisfaction regardless of whether a voter’s preferred party gains power.
How the Argument Is Tested
Singh tests this claim with three complementary designs that isolate the timing of elections from electoral victory or defeat:
The timing of interviews is central to the design: by comparing attitudes immediately before and after elections and using panel and experimental controls, the studies separate the electoral event effect from the effect of winning or losing.
What the Evidence Shows
Why This Matters
These findings suggest that elections themselves contribute to democratic legitimacy by improving citizens’ evaluations of their political system independent of partisan outcomes. The results speak to debates about what sustains public support for democracy and highlight the role of regular competitive elections in bolstering democratic satisfaction across different national contexts.

| Elections Increase Satisfaction with Democracy was authored by Shane Singh. It was published by Sage in CPS in 2025. |