FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Why Elections Boost Citizens’ Satisfaction With Democracy — Beyond Winners and Losers

satisfaction with democracyvoting and electionsSurvey ExperimentsPanel Surveyrepresentational responsivenessdemocratic legitimacyVoting and Elections@CPS4 DatasetsDataverse
Voting and Elections subfield banner

What the Paper Asks

Shane Singh investigates whether the act of holding elections — not just the experience of winning or losing — raises citizens’ satisfaction with democracy. He proposes that elections provide distinct psychosocial, representational, and economic benefits that can increase democratic satisfaction regardless of whether a voter’s preferred party gains power.

How the Argument Is Tested

Singh tests this claim with three complementary designs that isolate the timing of elections from electoral victory or defeat:

  • Study 1: Survey fieldwork that was interrupted by elections in several countries, allowing comparison of respondents interviewed before versus after elections.
  • Study 2: Cross-national panel survey data that track the same respondents over time around electoral events.
  • Study 3: A controlled survey experiment that manipulates exposure to election-related information to test causal effects.

The timing of interviews is central to the design: by comparing attitudes immediately before and after elections and using panel and experimental controls, the studies separate the electoral event effect from the effect of winning or losing.

What the Evidence Shows

  • Across all three studies, elections are associated with an increase in satisfaction with democracy.
  • Mechanism tests indicate the effect is driven mainly by the representational and economic utilities elections provide — for example, citizens perceive improved responsiveness and prospects for economic accountability after elections.
  • The psychosocial benefits (such as community or expressive effects) are theorized but receive weaker empirical support in these analyses.

Why This Matters

These findings suggest that elections themselves contribute to democratic legitimacy by improving citizens’ evaluations of their political system independent of partisan outcomes. The results speak to debates about what sustains public support for democracy and highlight the role of regular competitive elections in bolstering democratic satisfaction across different national contexts.

Article card for article: Elections Increase Satisfaction with Democracy
Elections Increase Satisfaction with Democracy was authored by Shane Singh. It was published by Sage in CPS in 2025.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Sage Journals
Comparative Political Studies