
Why Party Systems Matter for Democracy
Fabio Angiolillo asks a simple but consequential question: how (anti-)democratic are party systems themselves? Rather than treating autocratization mainly as an executive-led process or focusing only on opposition resistance, this study foregrounds parties’ collective regime preferences—how much disagreement about democracy versus authoritarianism exists across a country’s party system—and shows why that internal distribution matters for regime outcomes.
What the Party‑System Democracy Index Measures
The paper introduces the Party‑System Democracy Index (PSDI), a new cross‑national measure that tracks parties’ regime preferences over time. The PSDI captures the prevalence of pro‑democratic versus anti‑democratic positions within party systems, complementing traditional party‑system measures that emphasize policy differences rather than regime orientation.
How the Index Was Built and Tested
Key Findings
What This Means for Research and Practice
By putting parties’ regime positions at the center of analysis, the PSDI offers a new tool for scholars and analysts interested in the roots of democratic backsliding and democratization. The index expands the party‑systems literature and provides a practical early‑warning indicator for observers tracking risks of autocratization and democratic recovery across countries.

| Party Systems, Democratic Positions, and Regime Changes: Introducing the Party-System Democracy Index was authored by Fabio Angiolillo, Felix Wiebrecht and Staffan I. Lindberg. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2025. |