
Why This Question Matters
Electoral accountability depends on voters blaming incumbents for bad outcomes. Thiago de Miranda Queiroz Moreira asks whether rising political polarization undermines that accountability by changing how voters punish incumbents for poor economic performance.
What the Author Tests
The paper focuses on two concrete sanctioning channels: voting for the opposition and abstaining from the vote. The central claim is that as ideological distance between parties increases, fewer voters use either channel to punish incumbent parties for negative economic conditions.
Evidence and Methods
Key Findings
Why It Matters for Voting and Elections Research
These results indicate that polarization can blunt the informational and sanctioning role of elections by altering both economic perception and the translation of perception into electoral behavior. The findings have implications for theories of retrospective voting, partisan bias in political evaluation, and the capacity of democratic elections to hold leaders accountable in highly polarized contexts.

| Is It Still the Economy? Economic Voting in Polarized Politics was authored by Thiago M. Q. Moreira. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2025. |