FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

New survey method reveals EU political parties' socio-cultural and European integration positions are surprisingly comparable across nations.

European Politics subfield banner

Previous studies found that economic ideology is consistent among EU parties, but questioned the comparability of socio-cultural views. A novel approach using anchoring vignettes from a new dataset offers solutions.

Data & Methods:

  • Survey Technique: The 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey included anchoring vignettes ("bridge votes") to compare party positions across countries.
  • Analysis Method: Bayesian Aldrich-McKelvey technique used to estimate interval-level scales for socio-cultural and European integration dimensions.

Key Findings:

✅ Scales successfully measure both socio-cultural stance and EU position, despite country-specific variations in core issues.

✅ Positions are quantifiable at an interval level across all participating nations.

Why It Matters:

This breakthrough technique allows for systematic cross-national analysis of complex ideological dimensions previously difficult to compare.

Article card for article: Analyzing the Cross-National Comparability of Party Positions on the Socio-cultural and EU Dimensions in Europe
Analyzing the Cross-National Comparability of Party Positions on the Socio-cultural and EU Dimensions in Europe was authored by Seth Jolly, Ryan Bakker and Jonathan Polk. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2022.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods