FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Brexit Divide Ignites Economic Bias: Non-Partisan Split Shapes Perceptions

European Politics subfield banner

The UK's Brexit referendum created a distinct non-partisan divide, influencing economic perceptions among Remainers and Leavers. This paper investigates how this salient political division triggered evaluative biases through self-and in-group justification mechanisms, aligning with the cognitive dissonance framework.

Data & Methods:

The study employs nationally-representative observational survey data alongside experimental surveys that prompt respondents about Brexit.

Key Findings:

Researchers demonstrate that economic perceptions became polarized along the Brexit divide. A significant effect emerges when people are reminded of their stance on Brexit:

* Remainers tend to view the economy more positively.

* Leavers consistently show a more negative outlook.

The Brexit reminder intensifies these pre-existing differences.

Why It Matters:

This research reveals that motivated reasoning, previously thought tied exclusively to partisan politics, can also be activated by other prominent political divisions. These findings suggest broader implications for understanding public opinion formation and economic perceptions in divided societies.

Article card for article: A Tale of Two Peoples: Motivated Reasoning in the Aftermath of the Brexit Vote
A Tale of Two Peoples: Motivated Reasoning in the Aftermath of the Brexit Vote was authored by Miriam Sorace and Sara B. Hobolt. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods