NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Electoral Shifts: Why Southern Legislators Risk Short-Term Loss for Long-Term Gain

Party switching remains a significant career decision in American politics. This study offers the first systematic analysis comparing state legislative switchers and non-switchers across two decades of careers in the American South, where party alignment shifted rapidly toward Republicans.

Data & Methods:

  • Analyzed entire political trajectories of all Southern legislators over two election cycles
  • Tracked career decisions including reelection chances, retirement patterns, and ambitions for higher office
  • Differentiated between converts to GOP versus those who remained Democrats

Key Findings:

  • Switching parties comes with predictable short-term electoral costs
  • However, former Democrats are more likely than their Republican counterparts to seek higher political positions later in careers • This pattern is especially pronounced during earlier periods when the Republican bench was shallower

Implications:

The results demonstrate that career ambitions significantly influence party-switching decisions despite immediate electoral risks. These findings illuminate how partisan identity evolves and suggest strategic calculations behind legislative career changes.

State Politics & Policy Quarterly
Short-Term Pain for Long-Term Gain: The Logic of Legislative Party Switching in the Contemporary American South was authored by Antoine Yoshinaka and Seth C. Mckee. It was published in SPPQ in 2019. Find on Google Scholar10.1177/1532440019826062
American Politics subfield banner