FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Partisan Politics Taints Court Legitimacy Views

Law Courts Justice subfield banner

New survey experiments challenge the idea that courts are evaluated nonpartisely. People perceive state supreme courts as more impartial when decisions align with their party's policy goals, and less so otherwise. This perception shift negatively affects views of court legitimacy.

Data & Methods:

  • Original Study: Designed survey experiments validated by existing observational data
  • Research Approach: Explores the impact of partisan identity on judicial perceptions

Key Findings:

  • Partisan alignment strengthens belief in court impartiality
  • Court decisions contrary to one's party preferences undermine legitimacy trust

Why It Matters:

These findings suggest that public views of courts are not immune to political partisanship. This erosion in perceived impartiality can lead citizens to advocate for reduced judicial independence.

Article card for article: Public Perceptions of State Court Impartiality and Court Legitimacy in an Era of Partisan Politics
Public Perceptions of State Court Impartiality and Court Legitimacy in an Era of Partisan Politics was authored by Ryan Dawkins and Corey Barwick. It was published by Sage in SPPQ in 2020.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Sage Journals
State Politics & Policy Quarterly