FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Political Science's 400 Leading Journals: A 20-Year Retrospective Analysis

citation countsphd institutionsfaculty mobilityranking systemsTeaching and Learning@PS1 datasetDataverse
Teaching and Learning subfield banner

Key Insight: This essay examines how quantitative metrics have transformed the assessment of political science departments and individuals over two decades, building on earlier reputational rankings. The authors introduce a unique database tracking citation counts for faculty members from Ph.D-granting institutions between 1960-2005.

Methodology: Using this extensive dataset, we map publication trends to understand how scholarly productivity evolves through career paths and institutional affiliations. Data includes cumulative citations collected up to approximately 2002, along with faculty PhD origins and current departmental placements.

Findings: Faculty mobility appears central in the shift towards quantitative reputation rankings — scholars' careers increasingly shaped by publication impact rather than solely by reputation or alma mater prestige.

Article card for article: The Political Science 400: A 20-Year Update
The Political Science 400: A 20-Year Update was authored by Bernie Grofman, Natalie Masuoka and and Scott Feld. It was published by Cambridge in PS in 2007.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
PS: Political Science & Politics
Edit article record marker