
Headline:
How flawed are forecasts of U.S. Democratic presidential nominations? Our study reveals that fundamental factors, not early contest momentum, best predicted Joe Biden's eventual nomination win.
Introduction:
Standard forecasting methods focusing on campaign fundraising and early primary results often miss the mark when thereās no clear frontrunner.
Methods & Findings:
We replicated models from 1980-2016, which typically emphasize pre-primary variables like endorsements or Iowa/New Hampshire performance.
When applied to the chaotic 2020 primaries, these same 'fundamental' factors still proved most accurate for predicting Bidenās rise.
Key Insight:
Our analysis shows that core political fundamentalsāsuch as candidate characteristics and broad voter supportāare more predictive than campaign dynamics in early contests.
Takeaway:
This suggests 2024 forecasters should re-prioritize fundamental factors over short-term polling.

| Fundamentals Matter: Forecasting the 2020 Democratic Presidential Nomination was authored by Andrew Dowdle, Randall Adkins, Karen Sebold and Wayne Steger. It was published by Cambridge in PS in 2021. |
