FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Malapportionment vs. Electoral Fraud: Why Incumbents Use Both

Voting and Elections subfield banner

Incumbents use both malapportionment and blatant electoral fraud to secure election wins, yet these strategies differ significantly.

What They Are

  • Malapportionment involves allocating seats disproportionately in favor of strongholds without overt coercion or fraud.
  • Bt electoral fraud consists of direct methods like violence or cheating.

The paper reveals that malapportionment reduces the need for simultaneous fraudulent tactics, allowing governments greater flexibility. However, it creates rigid boundaries requiring careful coordination among ruling legislators to maintain control.

Article card for article: Blatant Electoral Fraud and the Value of a Vote
Blatant Electoral Fraud and the Value of a Vote was authored by Masaaki Higashijima. It was published by Cambridge in JJPS in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Japanese Journal of Political Science