FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

How Judicial Structures Shape Retirement Timing in Politics

Judicial Retirement SystemsComparative AnalysisMandatory Retirement AgeLaw Courts JusticePol. Behav.1 Stata file1 datasetDataverse
Law Courts Justice subfield banner

This article examines the influence of judicial institutions on retirement decisions.

Data & Methods: Using regression analysis across multiple countries.

  • Explores mandatory retirement laws
  • Analyzes voting patterns related to retirements
  • Compares constitutional designs worldwide

Key Findings: Contrary evidence shows that retirement age reforms significantly affect when judges leave office.

  • Judges in countries without mandatory retirement tend to step down earlier due to health factors.
  • Partisan considerations often influence the timing of judicial exits from power.
  • Strategic retirements occur more frequently in competitive electoral environments.

Why It Matters: These findings offer new insights into political control mechanisms and career trajectories within judiciary systems.

Article card for article: Judicial Institutions and the Political Economy of Retirements
Judicial Institutions and the Political Economy of Retirements was authored by David Hughes. It was published by Springer in Pol. Behav. in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Springer
Political Behavior
Edit article record marker