FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Is More Government Transparency Worse? States' Secret Debates Boost Credit

Sunshine LawsGeneral Obligation BondsCredit Risk ReductionEmpirical EvidenceAmerican PoliticsLSQDataverse
American Politics subfield banner

Does transparency enhance government trustworthiness or create problems?

This article examines a key tension in American politics: sunshine laws promote accountability but may reduce effectiveness.

Through clever research design,

we leveraged temporal variations in state legislative exemptions to study this dilemma.

Our empirical findings during 1995-2010 revealed something unexpected:

Key Finding: Removing transparency actually reduced investors' risk perception for state bonds.

This suggests a surprising reality: shielding debates might improve fiscal outcomes.

Article card for article: Legislative Transparency and Credit Risk
Legislative Transparency and Credit Risk was authored by Jeffrey J. Harden, Justin H. Kirkland and Patrick E. Shea. It was published by Wiley in LSQ in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Edit article record marker