FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Electoral Timing Matters? Field Experiment on U.S. Incentives Shows Nuances

Field ExperimentInvestment IncentivesU.S. MunicipalitiesElectoral CyclesAmerican Politics@AJPS1 Stata file1 datasetDataverse
American Politics subfield banner

Did the timing of elections influence local economic development policies? We conducted a field experiment across over 3,000 U.S. municipalities to investigate this.

Method:

• Legally incorporated a consultancy firm and posed inquiries on behalf of a fictional investor seeking municipal incentives.

• Tested whether pre- or post-election periods affected the likelihood of local governments offering investment incentives.

Findings:

• Overall results showed no significant difference in incentive offers based on election timing. • However, analysis limited to manufacturing-focused municipalities suggests an effect does exist here.

• Additional observational insights indicate that executive elections and partisanship may correlate with these policies.

Why It Matters:

This research highlights the complex interplay between electoral politics and economic policy implementation at local levels.

Article card for article: Electoral Institutions and Electoral Cycles in Investment Incentives: A Field Experiment on Over 3,000 U.S. Municipalities
Electoral Institutions and Electoral Cycles in Investment Incentives: A Field Experiment on Over 3,000 U.S. Municipalities was authored by Nathan Jensen, Michael Findley and Daniel Nielson. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2020.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science