FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Issue Ownership's Impact on US SOTU Addresses: Executive Priorities Under Three Constraints

Issue OwnershipCongressional StatutesQueen's SpeechLegislative AgendaComparative PoliticsBJPS3 Stata files3 datasetsDataverse
Comparative Politics subfield banner

This article explores how party-based issue ownership influences content within US congressional statutes (1947-2012) and State of the Union addresses, as well as UK acts of Parliament and Queen’s Speeches (1950-2010). Using time-series analyses, it identifies three conditions where executive incentives to pursue party-owned issues are constrained: responsiveness to public priorities, stronger electoral mandates, and divided government. The findings offer strong support for the theory in both systems but highlight notable institutional differences, providing insights into when governments focus exclusively on partisan issue priorities.

Article card for article: Party Reputations and Policy Priorities: How Issue Ownership Shapes Executive and Legislative Agendas
Party Reputations and Policy Priorities: How Issue Ownership Shapes Executive and Legislative Agendas was authored by Will Jennings and Jane Green. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
Edit article record marker