FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Coalition Compromise Backfires: Voters Punish Cooperation

Electoral ConsequencesCompromise PerceptionVoter AttitudesParliamentary DemocraciesPolitical BehaviorBJPS12 R files2 Stata files10 datasetsDataverse
Political Behavior subfield banner

Voters may penalize parties for the compromises made during coalition governance.

Data & Methods: Data from six parliamentary democracies (Iceland, Italy, Spain, Germany, Great Britain, and Israel).

Key Findings: Voters discount policy accomplishments and promises of compromising parties. This effect is stronger among former cabinet supporters and politically disinterested citizens.

Why It Matters? These findings highlight the electoral consequences of compromise perception in multiparty systems.

Article card for article: The Electoral Implications of Coalition Policy-Making
The Electoral Implications of Coalition Policy-Making was authored by David Fortunato. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
Edit article record marker