FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Fatal Terror Attacks Create Social Desirability Bias in Survey Responses

social desirability biasterror attackselectoral participationField ExperimentMethodology@AJPS8 Stata files13 datasetsDataverse
Methodology subfield banner

This article explores a new driver of social desirability bias in survey research: threat-inducing violent events. We focus on fatal terror attacks as a specific example, investigating their impact using cross-national analysis and natural/survey experiments.

We find that these attacks lead respondents to overreport past electoral participation – a classic measure of social desirability bias. This result highlights the need for researchers to consider survey timing relative to such threatening events.

Key findings suggest some previously reported increases in political engagement following violent conflict may be inflated, due partly to this heightened self-presentation pressure. The study underscores the importance of accounting for real-world violence when interpreting survey data.

Article card for article: Threat-Inducing Violent Events Exacerbate Social Desirability Bias in Survey Responses
Threat-Inducing Violent Events Exacerbate Social Desirability Bias in Survey Responses was authored by Shane Singh and Jaroslav Tir. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2023.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science
Edit article record marker