FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Does Political Sophistication Minimize Value Conflict? Evidence from a Heteroskedastic Graded IRT Model of Opinions Toward Climate Change

Value ConflictPolitical SophisticationIrt ModelClimate Change OpinionsValue ReconciliationPolitical BehaviorBJPS1 Stata file1 datasetDataverse
Subfield banner image

### New Findings

This study reveals that political sophistication may influence how citizens manage value conflicts regarding climate change policies.

### Data & Methods

We employed heteroskedastic graded item response theory models to analyze public opinion data on environmental and economic values toward climate change.

### Key Concepts

* Value conflict: Citizens holding multiple, potentially contradictory values relevant to policy opinions.

* Political sophistication: Ability to manage complex value systems in decision-making.

* Value reconciliation: Balancing different core values without compromising their importance.

Our findings demonstrate that individuals with higher political knowledge are more likely to reconcile environmental and economic values when forming opinions on climate change policies.

Article Card
Does Political Sophistication Minimize Value Conflict? Evidence from a Heteroskedastic Graded IRT Model of Opinions Toward Climate Change was authored by Paul Kellstedt, Mark D. Ramirez, Arnold Vedlitz and Sammy Zahran. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
Edit article record marker