FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Voters Perceive Party Agreement Through Elite Interactions

Elite InteractionDescriptive RepresentationMedia FramingNational ElectionsComparative PoliticsAJPS3 R filesDataverse
Comparative Politics subfield banner

New research reveals voters infer ideological alignment between parties based on elite interactions, not policy statements. Analyzing media reports across 13 Western democracies (2001-2014), we demonstrate that while voters expect coalition partners to agree ideologically regardless of actual policy tones or formal coalitions, this perception strengthens near national elections. 🔍

Key Findings:

• Voters associate perceived agreement with increased elite cooperation.

• The "cooperation effect" is strongest during election cycles. ⏰

Implications: These findings suggest parties must carefully manage their public image and strategic communication about ideological stances to influence voter perceptions, ultimately impacting descriptive representation theories across democracies. 🔍

Article card for article: Elite Interactions and Voters' Perceptions of Parties' Policy Positions
Elite Interactions and Voters' Perceptions of Parties' Policy Positions was authored by James Adams, Simon Weschle and Christopher Wlezien. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science
Edit article record marker