This study investigates partisan motivated reasoning through economic evaluations, testing if social disagreement in networks can reduce it.
Exposure to Dissent Weakens Identity
Contrary to expectations, interpersonal political disagreement was linked to reduced partisan identification in surveys from the US and UK. This suggests citizens may be more open-minded when exposed to opposing views within their social circles.
Limited Impact on Economic Evaluations
However, this exposure did not meaningfully reduce partisan differences in knowledge about economics or retrospective assessments of economic performance. The persistence of these divides highlights a key finding for political accountability discussions.
Elites Remain Accountable?
These results challenge assumptions that mere discussion can bridge partisan divides. Despite evidence suggesting disagreement may weaken party loyalty, core ideological distinctions related to economic issues remain largely intact—suggesting citizens maintain the ability to evaluate elite claims even amidst debate.
| Does Social Disagreement Attenuate Partisan Motivated Reasoning? A Test Case Concerning Economic Evaluations was authored by Joshua Robison. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2020. |
