FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Surprise: ISIS Attacks Shrink Online Supportbase on Twitter Data

International Relations subfield banner

This article examines how terrorist attacks affect support for Islamic State (IS) online, analyzing 300,842 observations from 13,321 Twitter accounts during a 127-day period.

Surprise: Our findings show that after major attacks, the number of followers for IS-related accounts actually decreases significantly. We investigate two competing mechanisms driving this outcome:

🔍 Data & Methods 🔍

We use unique Twitter data collected over time to track follower changes following specific attack events, treating these as natural experiments.

💡 Key Findings 💡

  • Number of followers drops for IS-linked accounts post-attack
  • Evidence points to disengagement rather than deterrence as the primary mechanism
  • Followers appear less likely and not more inclined to join despite attacks

🔎 Why It Matters 🔎

This study challenges assumptions about terrorism by showing that violent acts may actually repel potential supporters, offering insights into group dynamics under crisis.

Article card for article: Do Islamic State's Deadly Attacks Disengage, Deter, or Mobilize Supporters?
Do Islamic State's Deadly Attacks Disengage, Deter, or Mobilize Supporters? was authored by Joan Barcelo and Elena Labzina. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2020.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
British Journal of Political Science