FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Norwegian Elections: Unexpected Fragmentation After Proportional Representation Reform

This study examines the 1919 introduction of proportional representation (PR) in Norway. Using an extraordinary dataset that captures party vote shares before and after reform, it analyzes fragmentation incentives.

Context & Data: Tracking parties across single-member districts pre-reform to multi-member districts post-PR introduces unique challenges due to district boundaries persisting through the transition.

Key Findings: The authors find two main effects. First, PR itself caused party system fragmentation, driven partly by strategic party entry. Second, crucially for voters, many shifted parties (especially between Liberals/Conservatives) as incentives to strategically coordinate against Labor disappeared.

Implications: This research demonstrates how electoral rules can fundamentally alter both elite behavior and voting patterns in a specific historical context.

Article Card
Electoral Reform and Strategic Coordination was authored by Jon H. Fiva and Simon Hix. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
data