FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Anticorruption Crackdown in China Hurts Bureaucracy Talent Pool

Adverse SelectionHuman CapitalRegression AnalysisChinaAsian PoliticsPSR&M1 R file2 Stata files13 datasetsDataverse
Subfield banner image

China's push to eliminate corruption may unintentionally harm bureaucratic quality through adverse selection effects.

The Core Argument: Corruption serves as an informal talent incentive, attracting skilled officials. Anti-corruption efforts that reduce rent-seeking opportunities could lower recruitment standards and change candidate demographics.

* Methodology: Researchers used a nationwide survey of Chinese government officials combined with exogenous variations in enforcement levels created by recent anticorruption campaigns.

* Key Findings:

* Intensified anti-corruption enforcement lowers the average ability of newly recruited bureaucrats (deterrence effect).

* It discourages entry from lower socioeconomic groups while favoring affluent and well-connected candidates (compositional effect).

* Why This Matters: These findings reveal hidden human capital costs associated with corruption elimination, particularly in developing nations like China.

The study shows how policies targeting corruption can have unintended selection consequences across different levels of government.

Article Card
The Price of Probity: Anticorruption and Adverse Selection in the Chinese Bureaucracy was authored by Junyan Jiang, Zijie Shao and Zhiyuan Zhang. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2020.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Science Research & Methods
Edit article record marker