FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Speeches vs. Votes: Text Analysis Uncovers Bigger Swiss Party Preferences

Ideal Pointsintra-party preferencestext scalingswiss legislatureEuropean Politics@PSR&M16 R files3 datasetsDataverse
European Politics subfield banner

Estimating preferences within legislative parties is tricky.

💡 Key Question: Do speeches or votes better capture these differences?

We compared text-based scaling of ideal points with vote-based scaling in the Swiss legislature. Legislators speak more freely on most bills than they vote, making speech analysis less constrained by party discipline.

Our findings: Text scalings reveal greater intra-party disagreement than roll call data does.

Using regression models, we explained these differences as reflecting constituency-level preferences for energy policy.

Article card for article: Estimating Intra-Party Preferences: Comparing Speeches to Votes
Estimating Intra-Party Preferences: Comparing Speeches to Votes was authored by Daniel Schwarz, Denise Traber and Kenneth Benoit. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2017.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods