FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Speeches vs. Votes: Text Analysis Uncovers Bigger Swiss Party Preferences
Insights from the Field
intra-party preferences
ideal points
text scaling
swiss legislature
European Politics
PSR&M
16 R files
3 datasets
2 PDF files
Dataverse
Estimating Intra-Party Preferences: Comparing Speeches to Votes was authored by Daniel Schwarz, Denise Traber and Kenneth Benoit. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2017.

Estimating preferences within legislative parties is tricky.

💡 Key Question: Do speeches or votes better capture these differences?

We compared text-based scaling of ideal points with vote-based scaling in the Swiss legislature. Legislators speak more freely on most bills than they vote, making speech analysis less constrained by party discipline.

Our findings: Text scalings reveal greater intra-party disagreement than roll call data does.

Using regression models, we explained these differences as reflecting constituency-level preferences for energy policy.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Science Research & Methods
Podcast host Ryan