FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Venezuela Land Reforms: Individual vs Aggregate Data Matters for Testing Distributive Politics

Venezuela Land Reformsindividual-level datamacro-level analysisdistributive targetingMethodology@PSR&M9 Stata files6 datasetsDataverse
Methodology subfield banner

This article uses individual-level data from a Venezuelan land reform initiative to show how combining it with macro-level analysis improves testing of theories about distributive politics.

Individual-Level Data & Voter Preferences

The study analyzes voter preferences alongside benefit receipt records in Venezuela's contemporary land reform program.

Two Main Advantages

1. Comparing individual and aggregate data reveals a more complete picture of distributive targeting strategies.

2. Individual-level analysis alone can misattribute benefits due to subnational politicians' influence, obscuring initial target selection.

The article demonstrates both points using the Venezuelan case study and offers practical recommendations for multi-level data collection in political science research.

Article card for article: Theory and Methods in the Study of Distributive Politics
Theory and Methods in the Study of Distributive Politics was authored by Michael Albertus. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Science Research & Methods
Edit article record marker